The Lefroy mill at Gold Fields St Ives’ Kambalda operations. Picture: Jarrod Lucas/The Kalgoorlie Miner.
The Lefroy mill at Gold Fields St Ives’ Kambalda operations. Picture: Jarrod Lucas/The Kalgoorlie Miner.

A native title ruling could throw a shadow over BHP Billiton’s attempts to sell its Nickel West assets, after the Federal Court ruling last week paved the way for native title claims over BHP’s Kambalda nickel concentrator and Gold Fields’ St Ives mine.

In a decision released last week, the Federal Court ruled that the transfer of mining tenements from State Agreements between 2004 and 2007 should have triggered negotiations for a land use agreement with the Ngadju people, who claim native title over the region around Norseman and Kambalda.

The ruling covers more than 200 mining leases transferred from State agreements originally held by Western Mining Corporation.

They include leases over BHP’s Kambalda nickel concentrator and Gold Fields’ 400,000 ounce-a-year St Ives mine, the fourth largest gold producer in Australia last year.

Gold Fields said in January the action could force the closure of St Ives if the native title claimants sought an injunction to do so.

But the company softened its rhetoric this week, saying in a statement the decision “does not affect the grant of mining tenure to St Ives”.

It added operations would continue as usual pending the outcome of the process.

It is understood that, should the decision withstand appeal, the most likely outcome would be to force BHP Billiton and South Africa’s Gold Fields to the negotiating table to discuss compensation for previous and future years of the production from the facilities.

The decision comes at a particularly tricky time for BHP, which is running a beauty parade of buyers for its Nickel West assets.

A resurgent nickel price has lifted hopes it can get a good price for its WA nickel assets, but sources say any uncertainty over its tenure on key elements of the business, such as the Kambalda concentrator, could weigh on the final price.

BHP could also be forced to agree to terms which include an agreement to compensate the buyer for future costs associated with a court loss.

A BHP spokeswoman said yesterday the company was reviewing the findings of the Federal Court ruling but would not comment further.

Gold Fields said in a statement it would also take time to study the decision in detail, but it was likely the company would file an appeal.

The State Government was also a party to the legal action.

Attorney-General Michael Mischin said yesterday the Federal Court decision with respect to the Ngadju Peoples' claim for native title involved “complex legal questions as to the nature and effect of native title, which the State is currently reviewing”.

“The Government will consult with the other respondents in this matter and is considering what aspects of the decisions, if any, will be appealed,” he said.

The Goldfields Land and Sea Council, which ran the case for the Ngadju people, did not respond to requests for comment.

The West Australian

Popular videos

Compare & Save

Our Picks

Compare & Save

Follow Us

More from The West