If Starmer is ruthless, he needs to resolve 'purge' row quickly - as Labour faces first election crisis
When I asked Sir Keir Starmer a couple of weeks back if he was ruthless, he said he was - but qualified it.
His ruthlessness was trained firmly on trying to get a Labour government that "could change this country for the better".
He was "not ruthless for [his] own ambition" - nor was it ruthlessness for the Labour Party, he said.
"I'm ruthless for the county," said Sir Keir. "The only way we'll bring about change in the country is if we are ruthless about wining the general election."
But that ruthlessness is now blowing up and knocking the party's election campaign off course.
Politics live: Another Conservative defects to Labour
After a slick first week, Labour is having its first crisis, as the row over whether to de-select Diane Abbott has seized the headlines and muddied the message.
It has prompted, not just open splits at the top of the party, but wider questions about whether Starmer is purging the Labour Party as left-wing candidates are blocked from standing and loyalists are being drafted into safe sets.
Ms Abbott herself has called it a purge, while Andrew Fisher, who worked in Jeremy Corbyn's team, asked: "Is it racism, sexism, factionalism or a combination of all? Either way, it looks appalling."
After previously iron-tight discipline, the party is beginning to fray at the edges.
Ms Rayner, the most senior woman in the party, came to Ms Abbott's defence today, telling me on the Sky News Daily podcast that she should be allowed to stand if that is what she would like to do.
Yvette Cooper has also weighed in, describing Ms Abbott as a trailblazer and a "really important figure in the Labour party".
Starmer, for his part, says the decision hasn't been taken and will be made by the party's national executive committee.
But there is clear a split - and it looks ill-disciplined at exactly the time when the party needs to show the public that it is not another version of the warring Tories.
Ms Rayner was careful not to lay the blame of this at the feet of Starmer.
She told me when I asked if the party leader was trying to purge the left that she "didn't think Keir was acting in a factional way" - but that doesn't mean others are not.
When I asked her about what Andrew Fisher had said about this being a very bad look for the party, Ms Rayner said: "It's not a great look the way Diane was briefed against."
The briefings in The Times newspaper on Thursday night that Ms Abbott was going to be barred from standing, promoting her defiant response and a rally outside Hackney Town Hall, has taken the issue from being relatively contained to out of control.
And this is the dilemma for Starmer. If he is ruthless about changing Britain, the fewer left-wing firebrands on his benches, the better.
If he only wins a small majority, he needs the support of all his MPs and can ill-afford a left faction frustrating his government.
So de-selecting potentially unruly future MPs and replacing them with loyalists makes perfect ruthless sense.
But when does being ruthless tip over into something more sinister, that seems unfair and actually turns voters off?
Read more election analysis:
Why defecting Tory isn't great fit for Labour, either
Polling suggests trouble ahead for Starmer
Mark the moment we found out Labour's tax plans could crumble
Perhaps the Labour high command thinks they can ride it out, purge these left-wingers and the news cycle moves on.
But the party already has a big problem in what are supposedly safe seats with the Muslim community that are angry over their stance on the Israel-Hamas war.
They are also facing an independent Jeremy Corbyn in Islington North.
Does the party really want to kick out the first-ever black woman MP from the party, too?
One senior Labour figure insists to me that this is not a purge and that it's "important" to see all these cases differently.
But even if that is the intention, it is not how it's being received among big chunks of Labour backers and voters.
If Sir Keir Starmer is really ruthless about winning this election, he might be advised to resolve this issue - and quickly.
As Rayner acknowledged, it has become a distraction and that will be - in her words - a "frustration" to Starmer.
His top team have long said they will have wobbles along the way and what's important is how it is handled.
This one needs sorting.
