Science minister pays damages to academic she accused of Hamas sympathy

A cabinet minister has apologised and paid damages to an academic after suggesting she had expressed sympathy for Hamas, with the costs covered by her department.

Michelle Donelan, the Science Secretary, retracted her comments about Professor Kate Sang and agreed to pay her an undisclosed sum on Tuesday, saying there was "no evidence" that the academic was a supporter of the group, which is proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the UK government.

It is understood taxpayers covered the sum paid to Prof Sang and that it was handed over in an effort to reduce the costs that could have resulted from protracted legal action.

Politics latest:
Chancellor to cut national insurance in crucial pre-election budget

Labour demanded to know how much money was spent and called Ms Donelan's false allegations a "new low in government standards", while the Lib Dems called for a cabinet office inquiry.

Ms Donelan had tweeted a letter she had written to UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) in October, expressing "disgust and outrage" that Prof Sang and another academic, Dr Kamna Patel, had "shared extremist views" and, in Prof Sang's case, alleged she had expressed sympathy for Hamas after the 7 October attacks in Israel.

The letter followed a tweet by Prof Sang saying "this is disturbing", and containing a link to an article by the Guardian describing the response to the Hamas attacks in the UK.

Dr Patel had retweeted a post describing Israeli actions as "genocide and apartheid".

Both academics had recently been appointed to UKRI's advisory group on equality, diversity and inclusion.

Ms Donelan said they should be removed from their posts as they "appear to have contravened the Nolan principles of public life" - which are the basis of the ethical standards expected of public office holders.

As a result, both Prof Sang and Dr Patel were subject to an investigation by UKRI, which uncovered no evidence that they had expressed extremist views or support for Hamas, or breached the terms of their appointments.

In a statement on Tuesday, Ms Donelan accepted that Prof Sang's comments referred to the Guardian story as a whole, and not just the headline, which focused on the government's crackdown on support for Hamas.

The government minister said: "I am grateful for Professor Sang's clarification, and I am pleased to be able to withdraw my original concerns in relation to this specific tweet.

"I will make this clear to UKRI which has also now concluded that there is no evidence of any breach of the Nolan principles or failings in the appointment process to the EDI board.

"As I said to the media at the time, and I want to reiterate now: I have never thought or claimed that Professor Sang, or any member of the board, committed a criminal offence.

"I fully accept that she is not an extremist, a supporter of Hamas or any other proscribed organisation and I note that an independent investigation has concluded that there is no evidence that she is. I have deleted my original post to my X account."

Academics 'disturbed' by misplaced accusations

Prof Sang said: "I am delighted that this matter has now concluded, but very disturbed by the way in which Michelle Donelan and UKRI behaved.

"Had they asked me at the start, I would have explained the true position. Instead, Michelle Donelan made a cheap political point at my expense and caused serious damage to my reputation. I propose to donate part of the damages she has paid to a charity."

Dr Patel described the experience as "distressing", saying she was "glad" the process had concluded.

She said: "There was never any need for UKRI to investigate as it should have been obvious from the start that we had not breached the Nolan principles or expressed extremist views.

"Worryingly, it appears UKRI were steered by who made the claim and not its substance."

A government source said the prime minister has "full confidence" in "excellent minister" Ms Donelan.

However, shadow science secretary Peter Kyle said the cabinet secretary "must prove she still has the confidence of the research community" too.

"Accusing researchers of sharing extremist material and sympathising with a proscribed group, without any proof, is a new low in government standards," the Labour MP added.

Read more:
Activists gather at council meeting demanding Gaza ceasefire

Lib Dem deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: "The public will be shocked to read reports that Michelle Donelan's department may have used taxpayer funds to cover her damages and legal costs in this case.

"People deserve answers and not yet another Conservative cover-up.

"A Cabinet Office inquiry is urgently needed to get to the bottom of exactly what happened, whether any rules were broken and how much public money was spent."

Law firm Bindmans, which represented Prof Sang in her libel complaint, also criticised the thinktank Policy Exchange for putting out what it described as a "seriously misleading press release" about the academics' comments.

Tamsin Allen, a partner at Bindmans, said: "It is extraordinary that a minister should be guided by a lobby group into making serious false allegations about private citizens without doing the first piece of due diligence."

Policy Exchange has been contacted for comment.