Republican pushback on tariffs gathers steam as Trump stands firm

By Susan Cornwell and Veronica Gomez

Republican pushback on Trump tariffs gathers steam as president stands firm

Republican pushback on Trump tariffs gathers steam as president stands firm

WASHINGTON/MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Donald Trump's top economic adviser Gary Cohn resigned on Tuesday after the U.S. president said he would push ahead with punitive tariffs on steel and aluminum imports which some critics have dubbed the first shot in a global trade war.

Cohn did not spell out the reasons for his resignation, although he was regarded as a bulwark of economic orthodoxy in an administration whose protectionist policies have sparked alarm among U.S. legislators and in governments across the world.

Despite a rising tide of criticism from Republican lawmakers about the proposed 25 percent tariffs on steel and 10 percent on aluminum imports, Trump said he would stick to his guns and again lashed out at what he described as a rigged trading system

that has bled American companies and jobs.

Given the size of America's trade deficit, Trump said the country would not be a loser in any fight.

"When we're behind on every single country, trade wars aren't so bad," he told reporters at the White House at a news conference on Tuesday with the Swedish prime minister.

Critics worry that the measures risk igniting a trade war and damaging the U.S. economy.

A prominent Republican critic of the proposal, House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan, returned to the attack on Tuesday, saying the proposed duties were too broad. Although the measure is designed to hit China, its main impact will be on U.S. allies like Canada.

Ryan, whose home state of Wisconsin could be hit by proposed counter-tariffs from the European Union, has consistently opposed the tariffs and called for "more surgical and more targeted measures."

The White House has said the measures will protect industries and jobs from unfair competition and that across-the- board tariffs are needed because countries like China use third countries for shipping steel to the United States, disguising its origin.

Opponents charge that the tariffs could destroy more jobs than they create and risk alienating U.S. allies, while American consumers will end up paying more for a range of products from cans of beer to cars.

"There is a lot of concern among Republican senators that this could sort of metastasize into sort of a larger trade war, and many of our members are discussing with the administration just how broad, how sweeping this might be," Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell said in his first comments on the issue.

Financial markets have rallied off their lows on expectations the measures may be watered down in the face of an intense lobbying effort from leading Republicans.

On Tuesday, Representative Mark Meadows, the head of the Freedom Caucus, a staunchly conservative Republican grouping in Congress, raised concerns about the impact of the tariffs on U.S. manufacturing and agriculture. Agriculture is a potential target for retaliatory tariffs from China if Trump pushes ahead.

Meadows, who spoke to reporters after a closed-door meeting with House Republicans, said: “Most of the conversation I heard was not in support of that particular decision.”

Trump had been presented with three options by the Commerce Department. The broad tariffs that he announced last week were one. He also had the option of imposing a much higher duty of 53 percent on steel imports from on a narrower group of 12 countries that did not include Canada, Mexico and the European Union, although all countries would be subject to quotas.

For aluminum, China, Hong Kong, Russia, Venezuela and Vietnam would be subject to direct tariffs and others to quotas.

The final option called for quotas for both industries to limit imports.


Washington said on Monday that if Canada and Mexico agreed to its demands in talks to update the North American Free Trade Agreement, they could be exempted from the proposed steel and aluminum tariffs. Trump repeated the proposal on Tuesday after the latest round of trilateral NAFTA talks ground to a close following six months of discussions that have achieved little progress.

Both Mexico and Canada have rejected the proposal.

Mexican Economy Minister Ildefonso Guajardo raised the prospect of reprisals if Washington pushed ahead with tariffs and insisted that NAFTA remain "a trilateral accord" in response to a U.S. proposal to hold talks with Canada and Mexico separately.

"There's a list (of U.S. products) that we are analyzing internally, but we won't make it public, we're going to wait," Guajardo told the Televisa network in an interview.

Canada has also said it would take counter-measures, as has the European Union.

Trump took aim at the EU at his news conference with Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Lofven, saying the bloc had treated the United States unfairly on trade.

Trump has vowed to cut America's trade deficit and accuses countries like China of cheating. He has launched an investigation into intellectual property abuses by China, a move that could dwarf any impact of the steel and aluminum proposals and trigger a sharp response from Beijing.

Fred Bergsten, who held top economics posts in a series of U.S. administrations and is a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics think tank, warned on Tuesday that the proposed tariffs would undermine Washington's efforts to rein in China by alienating potential allies.

"President Trump's recent trade actions, especially the announced plans to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum, will have little effect on China. In fact, they will make confronting China with an alliance of trading partners much harder," he said.

(Additional reporting by Jason Lange, Lisa Lambert, Richard Cowan and Jeff Mason; Writing by David Chance; Editing by Peter Cooney and Tom Brown)

Back To Top