Why are sporting boards so secretive?

By Ross Lewis, Online Sports Editor | View Archive October 28th, 2009, 12:43 pm

Paul McNamee is claiming that while he might have lost the battle, he has won the war.

The support for McNamee's divide-and-conquer approach to displacing long-time Tennis Australia president Geoff Pollard was supposedly so strong it has forced a change in thinking within the local game's administration.


It wasn't strong enough to win the election. Pollard remains in the No.1 courtside box.

And whether McNamee can accurately say he had enough votes to force a seachange in Australian tennis cannot be proven. Maybe the ball was in. Maybe it was out. But you can't be serious about manner in which it was achieved.

The result of the vote remains a secret. McNamee could well have been beaten by the casting vote of Pollard himself. But the details are under lock and key with an accountancy firm. We'll never know.

Why not? Tennis Australia is a body owned by the people, not some private group of hobnobs who have a regular gig scoffing strawberries and cream at Wimbledon. We have a right to know.

Each year, TA goes to the State and Federal governments seeking tax-payer funds for new courts, new junior programs and new coaches. Delegates from every State association vote on the presidential election. Those delegates are decided by thousands of local players and officials. Yet none of those participants and taxpayers are permitted to know the level of support for the person they have put in charge of their interests.

It is becoming a trend at top-level sport. The WA Football Commission's elections are similarly suspicious. The WAFC has recently called for applications for its board. Candidates are later put to WA football's stakeholders, West Coast, Fremantle, WAFL, and country and amateur associations for a vote.

What happens in between is done in secrecy and raises concerns about the legitimacy of the process.

Applicants for the post are culled by the existing WAFC board. The commissioners then put up to the stakeholders those people they want to join them in the Subiaco Oval corporate box for AFL matches. But the WAFC tries to keep the identities of the candidates a secret.

The public, the people for whom they are running the game, apparently shouldn't know who was willing to put their hand up to hold WA football's power.

And why should we? After all, we're only the most important element in sport.

--

Get the flak jacket. Put on the protective head gear and get a shield to protect an already thick skin. A bold statement that is set to infuriate a vocal minority among the sporting fraternity is about to be made.

Australia can't host a World Cup by 2022.

There. It has been said.

The opinion is based, not on a policy of soccer-bashing as many will accuse, but on our country.

We're not big enough. We don't have big enough airports, sufficient hotel beds, the personnel and, most significantly of all, the venues to do it. It would be outstanding to be proved wrong. But the world can't take that chance.

--

The Arthur Tunstall (official of the week)
Adrian Anderson (AFL): So the AFL wants to get players to become umpires and pay them $25,000 a year to learn. First of all the league would have to teach them the rules. But maybe to add some excitement to the games they could get Barry Hall to become a whistleblower. Now, that would be fun.

Cobb and Co. coach of the week
Andy Moles (NZ cricket): There is one sure way to be sacked in sport - lose the respect of your players. Moles did. And with players having so much control on their codes there is only one place for a coach to go in that situation. Out the door.

The Big Blunder (presented by the makers of the aluminium bat)
Caroline Wozniacki (tennis): Sometimes messages can be lost in translation. Wozniacki probably did the right thing by pulling out of a match when injury was obviously going to prevent her from continuing in a tournament. But next time she should tell her father to keep quiet.

Toughen up Princess prize
America's Cup field: Australia has lost interest in the America's Cup. After perusing all the legal to-ing and fro-ing over the next challenge, it's no wonder why.

Comments

  1. abbott_colin View Profile

    So, Ross, you're saying Australia can't score by the year 2022? Ooh ... I think that one will have to go to the Dubious Goals Committee. And that's a professional foul in my book. I'm afraid it's a red card for you, my son ... reckon you'd better create a bit of space... quick! Er ... are ya wearing that flak jacket of yours? Flak? Yeah ... watch out for the Pom-Poms!

    Oct 28 07:13 pm
  2. bomber_moose View Profile

    Bugger me Ross, have you had a look at Cometti's mess.
    I disagree with you about not being able to host the world soccer cup mate, this is Australia and we are an able bodied bunch. I wont go as far as colin , but its a penalty shot for interference in the box mate. Thats the goal square not the meat & spuds protector.

    Oct 29 04:28 pm
  3. ross_lewis_thewest View Profile

    Sorry guys but we just don't have the infrastructure to do it. I'm not making a call on soccer as a game. My view is based on the fact that 25 million people in five cities can't handle such a big event. Also, the time zone factor is a mammoth problem, particularly when TV rights are concerned.

    Oct 29 05:19 pm
  4. douganthonyallstars View Profile

    ummm, we compare to South Africa fairly favourably regards being able to pull off the world cup, surely?

    Oct 30 05:02 pm
  5. ross_lewis_thewest View Profile

    South Africa got the World Cup by default. The 2010 Cup "had" to be in Africa under FIFA rules. That process has been disbanded. But anyway South Africa doesn't present the travel challenges that would be faced in Australia. And it has a very cheap workforce at its disposal.

    Oct 31 02:05 pm
  • 1 - 5 of 5 Entries

Post your comment

To post a new comment, you must Sign in first.

The West News Preferences

Close

Select your state to see news for your area.