Six-lane Stirling Highway row
An unfinished study that proposes widening Stirling Highway to six lanes has forced a planned Claremont residential development to be pushed back 15m from the road's edge.
The original three-storey plan for the development on the corner of Freshwater Parade has also been increased to six storeys to allow for a similar number of units.
Claremont mayor Jock Barker said it was ludicrous that well-ordered planning processes were being hijacked by a study that no-one had seen, that was being promoted by faceless public servants and had not been endorsed by government.
The Stirling Highway Activity Corridor study being undertaken by the WA Planning Commission is believed to support a widening of the highway from Nedlands to Fremantle.
Mr Barker said council officers had been told that to achieve it, sections of 1220 properties would need to be resumed and several buildings, including Claremont council offices and the Claremont war memorial, would have to be moved.
A WAPC spokesman said an amendment to the Metropolitan Regional Scheme - which would rationalise road reservations to allow for the future widening of Stirling Highway - would soon be considered by the Minister for Planning. If approved, the amendment would then be released for public comment.
The spokesman confirmed that the WAPC had already purchased a property at the corner of Stirling Highway and Bayview Terrace, at the request of the landowner, because of the impact of future road reservations on the building.
Premier Colin Barnett, who is also the local Cottesloe MP, confirmed that the study - and the proposed widening of Stirling Highway - had not been endorsed by the State Government.
"The idea is part of a planning process and the State Government has not considered it or made any decision," he said.
If the widening proposal is approved, it would have a direct, personal impact on Mr Barnett - his Claremont home backs directly on to the highway.
The original three-storey residential Freshwater Parade development was approved by Claremont Town Council in December 2010. However, because it did not comply with the road-widening setbacks of the corridor study, it was referred to the WAPC.
After discussions with the Department of Planning, the development application was revised to accommodate the road widening.
"This is Alice in Wonderland stuff," Mr Barker said. "We are being asked to consider a development application on the basis of a study that has not been endorsed in any way, shape or form by the State Parliament."Follow thewest.com.au on Twitter
Explore More
West Rewards
Breaking
- 1:09 pm Hundreds in riverside rally
- 12:39 pm Warne named in cricket hall of fame
- 9:50 am Abbott says Labor ballot won't end poison
- 9:48 am Rudd enjoys family time before ballot
- 9:24 am York fires raise suspicion
- 9:09 am Fire destroys Redcliffe house
- 8:58 am Four injured in freeway crash
- 8:47 am Attack fears scaring away Indian tourists
- 3:27 pm Bushfires close NW Highway
- 3:23 pm Whalers 'return to Australian waters'
Most Commented
- Rudd put own interests first: Swan 200 Comments
- Civil war as Gillard calls leadership spill 58 Comments
- DEC failed to assess burn risk: Keelty 21 Comments
- Rudd vs Gillard: leadership battle begins 16 Comments
- Telstra crash boots millions of users 9 Comments
- I'd never have done what Lyon did: Harvey 6 Comments
- I'd pay $1.5m for Buddy: Lyon 4 Comments
- Katich in frame for WA return 3 Comments
- Lawson annoyed at 'self indulgent' Ponting 3 Comments
- Banned AFL agent in more trouble 2 Comments
Sponsored links
ALSO ON THE WEST
'The West Australian' is a trademark of West Australian Newspapers Limited 2012.
All rights reserved.
19 Comments
Doesn't need to be widened to 3 lanes, just needs to restrict right hand turns across the highway into minor streets. Widening at selected points to add a righ hand turn lane would be more than enough.
ReplyHow about more train services and a better network of public transport (buses and light rail) to connect into the rail system. Plus imporved bike storage at the stations. The less cars heading into the city the better. This will be a long term fix.
1 ReplyNo matter how the transport service is or should be we still need a good roads network. This expansion should happen.
ReplyThe libs are back to their dirty trick's, fix the road problem in their area and stuff the rest of us!
ReplyThere is no freeway from Perth to Fremantle and no room to build one, unless they buy all the land up either side of the railway on the Fremantle line and do the same as kwinana freeway. There is no alternantive but to widen Stirling Hwy. Or lower public transort fares drastically and make parking...
1 ReplyThe Lobs love building roads at the expense of better public transport. In this case; however, the road will not be widened as it passes through sacred land.
3 RepliesAll Fremantle-Perth through traffic bottlenecks at the lights at Claremont, because the highway is sandwiched between the Claremont town centre, the railway and the Swan River. All other parts of Stirling Hwy flow smoothly. More lanes won't fix the problem while the traffic lights exist. A...
2 RepliesMr. Barnett has confirmed that the study has not been endorsed by the State Government. Why then has Town of Claremont been forced to reconsider a decision on the basis of this study (which the WAPC refuses to release or provide a copy of so that elected members are fully informed on a matter...
ReplyWhy are properties already being bought up on Stirling Highway (Richards Electric for one). What is the fate of the many heritage buildings that will fall in the path of reserve widening? Will there be any meaningful consultation with residents along Stirling Highway, or who could find themselves...
ReplyThe people of Cottesloe voted him in, now they are seeing the very big downside of the aristocratic methods of Colin Barnett, and his crazy sidekick, Troy Buswell.
Reply