Recreational fishers face paying a land-based fishing licence after Fisheries Minister Norman Moore refused to rule it out yesterday as an option to save fish stocks.
Mr Moore said while the State Government had previously decided not to go down the path of imposing such a licence fee, he would look at every option when research into shore-based fishing stocks was completed by the end of the year.
"I don't want to speculate on the future but if the fishery is under threat we will have to look at every option that relates to making sure that the fishery is sustained," he said.
"If those fisheries are under threat, then we will take the necessary action to save them."
A $300,000 research program was announced by the State Government in December to assess the effects of shore-based fishing.
The Government said at the time there was evidence that a two-month recreational fishing ban from October 15 on demersal scale fish such as pink snapper and dhufish had caused some fishermen to switch to shore-based fish targeting species such as herring, whiting and tailor.
Recfishwest executive director Frank Prokop said while such a fee would be unpopular, he wouldn't oppose a move by the Government to introduce a land-based fishing licence. But he said he preferred a general fishing licence of $20 to $30 for all adults who wanted to fish from both boats and the shore. Ben Patrick, spokesman for the Australian Fishing Trade Association in WA and a local tackle manufacturer, said the licensing system was a "dog's breakfast".
Mr Patrick said if all the other licences were abolished, a land-based fee would be worth looking at.
But he said no recreational fisher in WA would be happy about a land-based fishing fee until the recreational community had a say in where the proceeds were spent.
A spokesman for Mr Moore said a general fishing licence had been considered in March last year as one of a range of options.
He said money had been allocated for this year from the newly introduced recreational boat fishing licence fees to management, compliance, research and licensing within the recreational fishing industry.
Earlier this month, it became law for all recreational fishers using a powered vessel to have a recreational fishing licence, which costs $30 a year.Sponsored links
'The West Australian' is a trademark of West Australian Newspapers Limited 2012.
All rights reserved.
Select your state to see news for your area.
41 Comments
Idiots, this is just a tax to raise revenue - if they were fair dinkum about fish stocks they would look at targetting "commercial" fisherman who would represent about 95% of all fish taken from the ocean - what a joke - don't pretend for one millisecond that taxing the average punter will have any impact on fish stocks
ReplyI do not have a problem with paying for the use of resources. Australians have, for too long, overused, overfished, overfarmed, overgrazed, overdone practially everything to turn this environment into a wasteland in waiting. My only concern would be that a legally binding commitment accompanies this new licence to ensure that all monies are directed at fish stock conservation and environmental improvements in the marine environment.
ReplyIt is reasonable to have such a license? I would say it only harm the fishing retailer. I guess other country does not have such license impose on fishing.
ReplyI dont mind paying a fee as long as the money goes back into fishing related issues ..aka ...restocking , habitat renewal , research so we can enjoy healthy fishing for years to come!
ReplyI voted liberal this time because I was concerned about where labor were heading in regards to this issue. Turning wide areas into national parks and banning fishing in others. Then this greeny moron rocks up. I don't mind paying a license but I think this guy is just getting started. He should concern himself with banning shark and gill nets, which do unbelievable amount of damage. Recreational fishers are just soft targets.
Reply