Abbott woos families with baby leave

CANBERRA, The West Australian February 9, 2010, 2:25 am
Tony Abbott

AP / Rob Griffith ©

A six-month scheme of paid parental leave and plans to extend to nannies similar pay and conditions as childcare workers are at the heart of a coalition policy being designed to woo families and female voters.

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has approved the development of a policy for the election campaign that would outdo Labor's promised taxpayer-funded, 18-week parental leave plan.

Mr Abbott has changed his mind since advocating last year in his book, Battlelines, a parental leave scheme to be funded by a levy on business.

Business baulked at the proposal and, in a recent interview with the Australian Women's Weekly, Mr Abbott admitted that since becoming leader, "my thinking has moved on a bit" and "it's very important that any national scheme doesn't disadvantage small business".

It is understood he has charged shadow early childhood education and child-care spokeswoman Sharman Stone with developing a policy that would be more generous and potentially more expensive than the Rudd Government's.

Last year, Labor announced an 18-week national scheme that would pay the primary carer the minimum wage of $544 a week, which would be taxed.

The scheme would apply to families whose primary carer earned less than $150,000 a year and the money would be paid on top of any employer-provided scheme.

The scheme was announced in the May Budget but because of the global financial crisis, its start was postponed to next January. It will cost $260 million a year, less than the $450 million scheme recommended by the Productivity Commission.

The coalition scheme would go further, providing paid leave for six months, a period Mr Abbott and Dr Stone believe breastfeeding should last, if possible.

It is understood Dr Stone is also working on a proposal to formalise conditions for nannies paid by parents to care for children at home. They would be paid like child-care workers and receive employer superannuation contributions. Neither policy has been completed or costed.

Perceived to have a problem image with women, Mr Abbott plans a raft of family friendly policies designed to encourage couples to have children.


Follow thewest.com.au on Twitter

7 Comments

  1. Ken S07:38am Tuesday 09th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

    Mr "Flip Flop" Abbott is just trying to improve his image with women. I personally think that as child bearing is a choice then those who choose it should pay for it.

    Reply
    1. Darryn08:52am Tuesday 09th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

      Great, just another burden on the tax payer for other people's choices. Maybe I should get a payment for NOT burdening my fellow taxpayers with a child and subsequent paid leave?

      Reply
      1. Jay09:22am Tuesday 09th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

        Ken s, spot on mate, he has never polled well with women, simply because of his jurassic ideas about virginity, marriage, abortion etc, and this move shows him up for an opportunist straw man who thinks he is a love child of howard and bishop. Savvy Aussie women will not be fooled so easily me...

        Reply
        1. Mitch Jones11:20am Tuesday 09th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

          Another burden? After hearing the Government’s intergenerational report did anyone else have the same thoughts as me? Realistically we can; increase taxes, have budget deficits, or increase population via migration or birth rates, to help ease the ‘burden’ of an increasingly ageing population...

          Reply
          1. Mitch Jones11:21am Tuesday 09th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

            You’ve already provided your views on tax so that would leave you with increasing population via migration or birth rates to pay for our increasing population (disregarding budget deficits because I don’t want us to end up like the US/UK/etc economies)

            Reply
            1. Mitch Jones11:21am Tuesday 09th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

              Personally I prefer some Government support for current Australian citizens other than further Government support for increased migrant levels, to meet the increasing costs of an increasing ageing population.

              Reply
              1. Mitch Jones11:22am Tuesday 09th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

                Why, should parents who already shoulder so much not be given a helping hand, so that you and everyone else can enjoy their retirements, off the back of their children. This is purely an economic view and doesn’t take into account other benefits of procreating.

                Reply

                Post a comment

                Do you have a Yahoo! ID? Sign in | Sign up

                The West News Preferences

                Close

                Select your state to see news for your area.