Academics want climate sceptic's lecture cancelled

GARETH PARKER and KATHERINE FLEMING, The West Australian Updated June 30, 2011, 2:55 am
Academics want climate sceptic s lecture cancelled

Sandie Bertrand © Lord Monckton in a Perth appearance last year.

UPDATE: Controversial climate sceptic Christopher Monckton has launched a scathing attack on the media for labelling him a “climate change denier”.

Lord Monckton, who told a mining conference at Burswood this morning the earth was cooling and a carbon tax would be costly for little impact on climate change, came under fire recently for likening Federal climate advisor Ross Garnaut to a fascist.

He reiterated his “humble and complete apology” today but accused the media of using a similar slur against him.

“I have been called a climate denier, which accuses me of being on par with that nastiest form of facism: the holocaust denier,” he said. “There’s clearly a nasty double standard here.”

He also hit back at 50 academics who signed an open letter to Notre Dame University, where he will speak tonight, asking them to cancel the event because Lord Monckton misrepresents the work of scientists.

The letter, organised by University of Western Australia postgraduate student Natalie Latter, says the academics - which include UWA Professor Ullrich Ecker, Sydney’s University of Technology Professor Cynthia Mitchell and Dr Iain White, from the University of Manchester - says the academics are "deeply disturbed" that Notre Dame intends to host the lecture.

It accuses Lord Monckton of "propounding widely discredited fictions about climate change and misrepresenting the research of countless scientists".

"With zero peer-reviewed scientific publications, he has declared that the scientific enterprise is invalid and that climate science is fraudulent," the letter says.

"He stands for the kind of ignorance and superstition that universities have a duty to counter."

While conceding he had no scientific or academic qualifications, he said most academics in a free county would support his right to speak, even if “the view I express is not necessarily currently fashionable with the ruling class or the media”.

“Academic freedom requires that both sides of a case should be freely heard,” he said.

“The letter has been circulating for several weeks, I understand, so if there are only 50 names, academia in Australia is better than in other places.”

Notre Dame Business School Dean, Chris Doepel, said that while Lord Monckton’s views had attracted attention, the university had been assured there would be nothing offensive in his presentation.

Professor Doepel said the lecture’s format would allow questions and he expected Lord Monckton to be "vigorously challenged".

Curtin University Professor of Sustainability, Peter Newman - a signatory to the letter - said it was a disgrace any university associated itself with "someone who has clearly got no academic credibility".

Another signatory, Australian Professorial Fellow at UWA’s School of Psychology, Stephan Lewandowsky, said he strongly endorsed Lord Monckton’s right to free speech "for example in a pub or on a soapbox or in a circus arena".

While Ms Rinehart’s company Hancock Prospecting sponsored the lecture, titled The Climate of Freedom, it did not fund Lord Monckton’s three-week Australian tour.

South Australian farmer Leon Ashby, president of the Climate Sceptics Party, said his organisation had contributed $30,000 in donation to Lord Monckton’s trip.


Follow thewest.com.au on Twitter
Show:
Oldest First
Newest First
Top Rated
Most Replies

257 Comments

  1. 23 5
    Graham03:29am Thursday 30th June 2011 WSTReport Abuse

    How on Earth have we arrived at a situation where holding a viewpoint that climate change is a load of hogs-wash could possibly be described as "offensive"? If it is offensive, then sadly I'll have to agree with Lord Monckton and be an offender. The problem with these climate change "scientists" is that they have short memories. It was only 30 years ago that eco-ists like Paul Erhlicht were predicting a global catastrophe resulting from "global cooling" due to all the particulate matter they thought was blanketing the Earth and stopping the sunlight getting in. It was nonsense then, and it's still nonsense now.

    8 Replies
  2. 14 3
    tazziesouza04:25am Thursday 30th June 2011 WSTReport Abuse

    What's wrong with having a different view point, I'm sure Lord Monckton is not the only one, there are a lot of skeptics out there.

    Reply
  3. holdril05:00am Thursday 30th June 2011 WSTReport Abuse

    I hope Peter Newman was misquoted. If he said ' someone who has clearly got no academic credibility' reeks of someone who has been unable to research basic English.

    Reply
  4. Rick06:05am Thursday 30th June 2011 WSTReport Abuse

    as much as I fully know global warming is a very very real issue and that climate change is the globes biggest problem. banning free speach will not change the mind of the fools who don't believe it. As It wouldn't change the minds of the Idiots who refuse to clean up their own mess any way.

    3 Replies
  5. ojars06:46am Thursday 30th June 2011 WSTReport Abuse

    Again, those that follow the populist view about man made climate change would deny anyone who has an opposing view. There are thousands of scientists who do not agree with the "politically acceptable" view and they are never given a forum. "Man Made Climate Change" is a THEORY not a FACT! Just because the vociferous shout it from the rooftops doesn't make it fact. Surely we are adult enough to hear opposing views?

    1 Reply

Perth

Currently

14.2°

Today's forecast: Sunny

- 22°

West Rewards

West Rewards
COMPARE & SAVE

iPhone 4S Cheapest Plans

My Resources

The West News Preferences

Close

Select your state to see news for your area.