Speeding motorists who escape penalty by claiming they do not know who was driving their vehicle at the time would be given 28 days to identify the driver or accept the fine and demerit points under a police plan.
A spokesman for Police Commissioner Karl O'Callaghan said about 4000 speeding infringements issued by speed cameras in 2008-09 had been withdrawn by police after the owners claimed they were not behind the wheel at the time and police could not prove that they were the driver.
Currently police have to investigate the identity of a speeding driver if the owner of the vehicle claims he or she does not know who was driving. If a company tells police they do not know who was driving a vehicle caught speeding they must pay double the specified fine.
It is understood police want an owner-onus law to be introduced.
It would give car owners 28 days to either identify the driver or submit a statutory declaration that the vehicle was stolen. Owners who failed to comply would be fined and lose demerit points.
It is believed police are still considering how the law could be changed to bring greater accountability to companies before they make a formal submission to the State Government.
Police Minister Rob Johnson said he supported owner-onus legislation and was working with police to "finalise a model".
"Of course, people who speed shouldn't get away with it," Mr Johnson said. "This is a question of public safety."
Police Union president Russell Armstrong said the loophole needed to be closed immediately given the Government's plans to double the number of speed cameras on WA roads.
"What is the point of increasing the number of cameras and having police issuing infringements if there's a get-out clause for people to exploit?" Mr Armstrong said.
"Police also waste time having to investigate the owner's claims that they weren't the ones driving."
Commander Michelle Fyfe said that police would soon present a submission on proposed changes to the laws to the Government.
"The current legislation requires a level of investigation by Police, yet places minimal demands on the vehicle owner to carry out any inquiry to determine who was driving the vehicle at the time of the offence," Ms Fyfe said.
"It is the WA Police position that a more streamlined process should be sought and that process ought to bring about greater public acceptance of vehicle owner responsibility."
Shadow police minister Margaret Quirk said that the impending increase in speed cameras meant there was a need to consider owner-onus laws.Sponsored links
'The West Australian' is a trademark of West Australian Newspapers Limited 2012.
All rights reserved.
Select your state to see news for your area.
27 Comments
Now that they have these new camera's surely reading the specification's of the 'Poliscan'.....they can identify anyone.
ReplyInnocent until proven guilty? No longer! How much further is this state going down the road to the totalitarian and unjust state? How much more are we prepared to take? Both sides of politics support the total surveillance police state. It’s become that bad that I don’t even bother to vote anymore.
ReplyGovernments are forever creating solutions and then searching for a problem. We got more speed cameras thus we now need owner onus laws. Just another example.
ReplyPolice should investigate the owner's claim as that is their job and they get well payed for it.!
ReplyA few weeks ago my daughter’s iPhone got stolen in a shop in town. This was captured on CCTV and reported to the police. So far, nothing! The police simply don’t have the time to investigate real crimes for there is no money in it for our greedy governments.
Reply