
The decades-long fight to protect Fremantle's low-rise character has entered a new phase with battlelines drawn over plans to increase height limits across a dozen east-end city sites.
The influential Fremantle Society, formed in 1972 on the back of bitter redevelopment rows, is behind the latest challenge to proposed changes to the City of Fremantle Town Planning Scheme.
While insisting that it is not anti-development, the society says the amendment, which will allow maximum heights of between five and 10 storeys at the 12 sites - up from five - was "simply too big".
The property sector, however, has welcomed the changes, and the council notes they would help meet State planning targets to boost the inner city population from 800 to 3500 and add 70,000sqm of office space and 20,000sqm of retail space.
Fremantle Society president Roel Loopers said though both sides agreed the mostly 1960s-built properties should be redeveloped, he believed the council was in "panic mode".
"The footprint is simply too big for that small part of the city," he said.
Mr Loopers said the society wanted the height limits of between three and six storeys at the 12 sites and argued there was vacant space within existing city buildings.
It's a view shared by about 30 people who attended the annual electors' meeting last week.
In a unanimous vote, which will now go to the council for consideration, they called for the amendment to be scrapped and only four sites to be developed initially - the Woolstores Shopping Centre, Wilson Parking carpark, Point Street carpark and Target building.
Fremantle MLA Adele Carles, who plans to table a petition in Parliament with hundreds of signatures against the amendment, said it paved the way for high-rise buildings in the city centre, which she contends would erode the heritage values of Fremantle.
However, Fremantle Chamber of Commerce chief executive Tim Milsom said Fremantle needed to re-think its development approach if it was to compete with other centres such as Joondalup and Midland.
Fremantle mayor Brad Pettitt said Fremantle had limited sites to pursue medium-density development away from heritage areas.
Far from panicking, he said the proposed changes were evidence-based following "plenty of studies".
Dr Pettitt said when the amendment goes before the planning committee tomorrow it would show a "tweaking" of bulk and height at some sites with design criteria strengthened.Sponsored links
'The West Australian' is a trademark of West Australian Newspapers Limited 2012.
All rights reserved.
Select your state to see news for your area.
5 Comments
Beware the good folks of Freo. Once the genie is out of the bottle, it is impossible to squeeze her back into the bottle. Take a look at the dogs’ breakfast that is Mandurah. Anyone who says Mandurah is still beautiful needs commitment to a place for lunatics. We have open plains for all here in Australia- USE IT.
Reply...here in Australia- USE IT.
ReplyPerhaps they could build a scale model to show all the deros who live in that ghastly city what the end result would look like. I can’t see much wrong with it but they would have to get rid of 90% of the current residents before decent people would move there. Currently a horrible place to visit.
ReplyFive stories is already too high. Keep it down, Freo.
ReplyFirst they ban plastic bags, now they want to restrict the building height, what next....the rumour that Miranda Kerr is moving to Perth as part of the population explosion we are having will not be true. And what about the Pizza at Bennys, how will they bring my coke with no plastic bags?
Reply