Homebirths far riskier: review

Cathy O'Leary Medical Editor Exclusive, The West Australian Updated November 13, 2010, 2:25 am

An expert review of homebirths in WA has recommended against the practice after finding babies in planned homebirth are almost four times as likely to be stillborn compared with those delivered in hospital.

The draft report, yet to be released by the Health Department, warns the State Government-funded Community Midwifery Program should continue only if major changes are made, including making women wanting homebirths sign written consent accepting the increased risks.

The Perinatal and Infant Mortality Committee review of 458 homebirths from 2005 to 2007 found seven homebirth babies died. Four of them died from loss of oxygen to the brain and three deaths were considered possibly avoidable.

It said the risk of stillbirth and infant death in homebirths was almost four times higher, with a death rate of 7.81 per thousand compared to 2.03 per thousand in hospital births

Significantly, the risk of stillbirth from asphyxia was 33 times higher in planned homebirths.

The committee said that in some cases routine screening tests were not carried out during pregnancy, homeopathic medicines were used and there were delays in transferring to hospital. .

The review, which also studied 80,000 women who had hospital births over the three years, found safety recommendations from 2007 had been ignored. A preliminary review of five stillbirths in planned homebirths in 2008 and 2009 showed the recommendations "had not been adhered to".

Australian Medical Association WA president Dave Mountain said the report added to the weight of worldwide evidence of the dangers associated with homebirths.

"It is irresponsible for those who support homebirth not to acknowledge the risks and to dismiss the concerns of obstetricians as nothing more than self-interest or turf protection," he said.

Dr Mountain said it was a tragedy some homebirth babies in WA had died of peripartum hypoxia, which meant that because of complications the baby was suddenly deprived of oxygen to the brain.

"In a hospital setting an obstetrician could save these babies by urgently performing a caesarean section or delivering the baby by vacuum extraction or forceps," he said.

"These are not operative procedures that a midwife can perform."

Princess Margaret Hospital paediatric consultant Jacqueline Scurlock said there was clear evidence homebirths were riskier and she regularly attended births where babies ran into problems unexpectedly and needed emergency care.

A Health Department spokeswoman said the committee report had yet to be finalised.


Follow thewest.com.au on Twitter
Show:
Oldest First
Newest First
Top Rated
Most Replies

28 Comments

  1. tazziesouza09:29am Saturday 13th November 2010 WSTReport Abuse

    Yes there are risks in homebirth but there are also risks in a hospital, woman have been having home births since humans started treading the Earth and hospital births for only maybe 150 yrs. Doctors can save bavies from a problem birth...BUT...it realy comes down to being the parents choice. It seems that all choice has gone out of the world these days...more like conform or else...

    Reply
  2. attitude11:01am Saturday 13th November 2010 WSTReport Abuse

    I had no option in the UK way back in the 60's. Two of my babies were born at home..safly and 3rd in a Nursing home..I much preferred the home birth. So nice to be in my own home..and not sharing a ward with others.

    2 Replies
  3. John11:10am Saturday 13th November 2010 WSTReport Abuse

    When I have an operation I am clearly warned of all the risks. This is to cover the hospital from lawsuits. If this process is not being observed by the alegedly responsible people supervising home births then they should be open to law suits as well as prosecution. The argument that it is a parent’s right to risk a child is the same one applied to faith healing. Perhaps Europe has it right. Full medical qualifications and genuine scientific review and evidence are required to practice any form of medicine.

    1 Reply
  4. K. K11:59am Saturday 13th November 2010 WSTReport Abuse

    Are all of these homebirths planned? Are they attended by a provider? What is the education level and credential of these providers? If people are going to have homebirths, let's find out what is going to make it most safe, rather than getting rid of it as an option.

    Reply
  5. Sonbeams09:17pm Saturday 13th November 2010 WSTReport Abuse

    Homebirths are the safer option. It provides a friendly, quiet, peaceful and safe environment. I know of many who had homebirths and the babies were contented babies, with none of the noise and bright lights. They are also with their mothers all the time and not separated with the risk of infections. Nor is there any risk of being 'accidentally' given medication for wrong diagnosis. My own ancestors and relatives in Eastern Europe all have homebirths. The medical profession should not interfere with the choices of parents. It's nothing but a controlling agenda.

    1 Reply

Perth

Currently

18.5°

Today's forecast: Sunny

- 22°

West Rewards

West Rewards
COMPARE & SAVE

iPhone 4S Cheapest Plans

My Resources

The West News Preferences

Close

Select your state to see news for your area.