Man guilty of not schooling daughters

JOE STOLLEY and BETHANY HIATT, The West Australian February 4, 2010, 1:31 pm
Father-of-six Hans Ulrich Meier was given a conditional release order.

WA News / Sandie Bertrand © Father-of-six Hans Ulrich Meier was given a conditional release order.

A father of six who was the first parent in WA charged for not sending his children to school has been found guilty of breaching the Education Act.

Hans Ulrich Meier, who prefers to be known as One, has said previously that children should be able to spend time outside having fun instead of being locked away in classrooms.

He was today given a conditional release order when he appeared in Midland Magistrate's Court.

Dressed in white and walking barefoot, Meier told the court that he had never refused to send his children to school, it had been their choice.

"Teaching has become something of a sit down, shut up and listen," he said.

Jemirah and Alisha, now aged 15 and 14, have hardly set foot in a classroom in the past few years.

They tried home schooling but that was abandoned when Meier had a disagreement with an Education Department moderator.

Meier’s two oldest sons, aged 17 and 19, also chose not to attend high school.

The court heard that his two daughters, Jemirah and Alisha, had only attended one day of school between June 2008 and April 2009.

By law children between six and 15 years of age must attend school.

If Meier breaks the conditional release order with a similar offence he will be fined $300 for each of his daughters.

He was also ordered to pay costs of $2271.

Meier, of Ellenbrook, faced a maximum fine of $2000 over the two charges laid by the Department of Education and Training.

In July last year, Meier told The West Australian that children should be able to spend time outside having fun instead of being locked away in classrooms.

"(At school) they have to wear a hat and put poisons on their skin before being allowed in the sun," he told the paper. "Children are being denied their freedom by keeping them in schools as batch numbers for society."

Asked what his children did with their extra time, Meier said they had fun by watching videos, listening to music or drawing and did their own learning.

"There are books galore in my house to do with what they want to do," he said. "They are not hanging around the streets. They don't drink, don't smoke, they stay indoors."

Meier said he was "blessed" to have been able to spend so much time with his children and was prepared to speak on behalf of other parents who wanted to teach their own beliefs at home.

Letting his children stay home had saved taxpayers an immense amount of money, he said.


Follow thewest.com.au on Twitter
Show:
Oldest First
Newest First
Top Rated
Most Replies

14 Comments

  1. BroncoPete02:44pm Thursday 04th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

    What does this say about our educators & government for allowing these kids to go so long without schooling. Life of crime awaits them & the tax payer will be the victim again. The education department needs hauling over the coals on this one or the government is in default.

    Reply
  2. PeterL03:21pm Thursday 04th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

    School is as much about learning to live by rules and becoming socialised as it is about learning anything else. This man is a fool. Children are not allowed to make legally binding decisions for a reason. They are not old or mature enough to do it so we as adults make the decisions for them. "He gave them the choice about school." Big surprise they chose not to go.

    Reply
  3. Mark03:26pm Thursday 04th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

    Peter, why a life of crime? This guy genuinely believes the education system is bad for the development of his children. I half agree with him. Our schools curriculum is designed to support a system that empowers the wealthy and keeps the rest of us subordinate. The only way to join the wealthy is to excel in their education system – in other words to embrace their hypocrisy. However once you are a major hypocrite then you spend the rest of your life empowering the system that made you so. I think the guy is harmless and exercising a right that every parent should have –the right to choose what you believe is best for your children. Leave “one” alone.

    Reply
  4. Samantha Duddy03:29pm Thursday 04th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

    Saved taxpayers money by not sending his kids to school hey..what about when they can't get jobs because they don't have a basic level of education. Is the father going to be supporting them, or will it be the taxpayer?

    Reply
  5. kylie04:23pm Thursday 04th February 2010 WSTReport Abuse

    Let him be we have lost sight of the fact we are a community and everyone finds there own way and has their own journey. He obviously loves his children. May they live well and be happy and prosper in this world, and to you!

    Reply

Perth

Currently

20.7°

Today's forecast: Sunny

- 22°

West Rewards

West Rewards
COMPARE & SAVE

iPhone 4S Cheapest Plans

My Resources

The West News Preferences

Close

Select your state to see news for your area.