[change]

Max° Min°

Bring back the man

By Sara Groen | View Archive September 16th, 2008, 5:01 pm
So the next Bond instalment is almost upon us. Picking up where Casino Royale left off, Quantum of Solace promises the usual 007 prerequisites of danger, betrayal, and forbidden love.

It's what we've come to expect of a brand that has become a genre in itself. A formula that has stood the test of time by adapting to the times, politically and socially.

And when it comes to the latter, Bond himself is the masculine zeitgeist. The man every woman wants, and every man wants to be, even before we know it ourselves.

Consider the turnaround in sentiment for Daniel Craig.

I wasn't the only one to question his appointment in late 2005. Critics were thick on the ground. Could a 37 year old English actor, little known outside his native Britain, take up the revered Bond mantle?

A sixth successor. And the first blonde.

Perhaps that's what first threw me. The blonde hair, it didn't look right. Then again, he just didn't seem right altogether. It was hard to put my finger on at the time. But like most of my friends who fell for the new gritty version, I would soon learn that Bond is always ahead of the time.

Sure, Pierce Brosnan was good - he must have been doing something right to last four films. But in the wake of a 90s metrosexual onslaught, women were craving something more of their leading man, on and off screen. Something more... manly.

The relatively short-lived ideal of the modern male as someone who cared about fashion and skin care as much as women was losing steam. Just not with men.

Research shows that the international market for male skin care products has jumped 40 percent since 2001. Companies are investing huge amounts of money in men's skincare, including L'Oreal Paris, which hired Brosnan to spruik its Men Expert skincare range.

And while men's wanting to take of themselves is all good and well, I don't want Bond telling me that "he's worth it". That's a line reserved for his female counterpart Halle Berry.

It was the melting icing on the cake of the Brosnan Bond reign. And taking its place, a buffet of masculine grit a la Daniel Craig.

The new Bond doesn't need fancy gadgets. He uses his bare bloody hands. He makes mistakes and he pays the price. He's suave without trying. And the female clincher, he shows emotional vulnerability.

Like Christian Bale's raw new Batman, Craig's Bond is refreshingly flawed and that's what makes him so appealing. He displays a brooding intensity that delves beyond the cinematic fantasy and a gritty realism that shows on his face.

Call me old fashioned, but rugged and weathered beats line-free on a man any day. A man who spends more time in front of the mirror than a woman? A Bond with a smooth forehead? No thanks. Perfection is not the ideal. Bond should come rough and ready. And I keenly await his return on November 14.

Comments

  1. kcornish52 View Profile

    Typical confused, feminist influenced opinion on a macho fantasy character and what makes a 'real man'! Men cant be too rough, too soft, too pretty, too ugly, too poor, too rich, too intelligent, too unintelligent, too emotional, too unemotional, too masculine, too feminine?! Bond doesnt have any major self-acceptance issues... hes a fictional character. Unfortunately, some of his female and male admirers or detractors need counselling, psychotherapy maybe even some prescription pills to

    Dec 19 06:43 pm
  2. sunnypuck View Profile

    Mr Craig is an actor known for risky parts. Just look at his Ted Hughes in Sylvia next to Ms Paltrow. He look decidedly unsexy in the role but still managed to pull the acting part off.

    I can't think of Bronson taking any such roles in the past.

    Maybe soon there will be a computer game like Bond Lego where you can build your own Bond. Imagine the title blurb.

    I'm Bond. Building Block Bond.

    Can't wait for the animated opening.

    MM? Garden gnomes are the 007s. That Y they

    Jan 29 02:44 am
  3. oohyeah_au View Profile

    Lol - what insanity - Bond - stirred not shaken - is just a fictional character - in the greatest of the "Bond" movies shaking or stirring the establishment - looking laughingly at the real world!

    Has anything changed?

    J

    Mar 21 12:05 am
  4. thornheart333 View Profile

    we yankees, over here , like the bloke, he is good, ay, but one thing for sure, the bond film
    needs to have something that includes the Australian Goverment sercret service not just
    CIA and brits, its boring, how about the film start and end in Syd or Perth, maybe Brisy
    or a secret lab in alice springs, something different , it is always middle east Asia, states,
    cuba brazil, blah blah blah, ok, seen it lived it, borning, lets bring Australia on line people.
    Craig is better

    Apr 15 02:10 am
  5. serena_zhou View Profile

    I absolutely agree with u! Call me old fashioned, I just can't stand a man with more make up or skin products home than me and the new blond haired bond was a true Bond I've been yearning to see less the never-got-hair-messed-after-a-gun-f ight Bond!

    Apr 16 05:29 pm

Post your comment

To post a new comment, you must Sign in first.

Yahoo!7 News Preferences

Close

Select your state to see news for your area.