[change]

Max° Min°

The great asylum seeker debate

By Nick McCallum | View Archive October 28th, 2009, 1:44 pm

During this divisive, emotional, angry debate about asylum seekers, I keep on coming back to one very simple question - If I was a Sri Lankan or an Afghan father and I genuinely thought the Government or the Taliban was going to torment or kill my family what would I do? 

The answer to me is equally simple. I would do whatever it takes to get my family out of there quick smart. If that meant paying my life's savings to people smugglers and risking a sea journey in a decrepid boat across thousands of kilometres to an unknown future, I'm honest enough to say I'd do it.

I'd do anything for my young sons. I don't know any father who wouldn't. And that is what, I believe, so many of the so-called 'boat people' are doing.

Now you can argue until you're black and blue about the rights and wrongs of current government policy, previous government policy, the Pacific Solution, the Indonesian solution, Christmas Island, Baxter etc etc. So many already have. There are legitimate arguments on both sides and they should be aired and debated honestly. Obviously we can't take all asylum seekers and obviously we have to discourage such dangerous sea journeys because so many lives are lost on them. We need to implement appropriate policies and clearly we're still a long way from that.

But what sickens me is the continual attempts to demonise the asylum seekers. As though trying to get a safe life for your family is a heinous crime. Politicians on both sides do it . The Howard Government's 'Children Overboard Affair' springs to mind, so does Mr Rudd's recent references to them as "illegals", when there is nothing illegal about seeking asylum in this country, never has been.

Public forums are rife with it. In so many blogs I read, on so much talk radio, I hear hatred and contempt towards the asylum seekers. Some want their boats to sink or be sunk. Some want them machine-gunned by the Australian Navy 'as a deterrent'. Some even hoped they'd carry out their initial threat of blowing up their boat.

I just don't get it!

Let's tone down the vicious, "I'm tougher than you are" rhetoric. The politicians must realise we are talking about people here, not about cheap political opportunism.

Stop pandering and start solving.

The rest of us should ask ourselves the question - what would you do in their shoes?  I have yet to speak to any parent, even the most vehement asylum seeker critic, who wouldn't do EXACTLY what they're doing.

Identifying with them might not change your mind about what should happen to asylum seekers, but it will certainly improve the quality of the debate over their future.

Comments

  1. sheilaywilliams View Profile

    Let's just remove our signature from the United Nations agreement on Refugees and Asylum seekers. and remove all people arriving here illegally, whether they come by boat or plane, outstay their Visa.s or any other reason. That way we should be able to choose and regain autonomy of our own land/ After all wasn't it the Tamils who created the problem in Sri Lanka/ in the first place? Do we really want them as citizens, Remember the acid incident? Yes let us take refugees but let us choose

    Oct 29 05:18 am
  2. gilt_free View Profile

    The UN agreement on Refugees was signed because at that time Australia was always willing to take in the white refugees from Europe. Nobody objected then. Now Australia is caught on the wrong foot and everybody is objecting. There are more than ten thousand white Brits and other E'peans overstaying their visas for more than fifteen years and they are allowed to stay. Whether anybody likes it or not Australia will have to take in a couple of thousands in the near future.

    Oct 29 10:56 pm
  3. sangstarchild View Profile

    The most effective way to stop new boats arriving is to have corporal punishment for the people that are in charge of the boat. One way is to use the pilot's of the boat as live targets, the other is to give the pilot's 20 lashes for each day that their cargo are kept in Australian waters.

    Oct 30 07:49 am
  4. sangstarchild View Profile

    I agree with having our signatures remove from the UN. What you say Rudd lets have a referendum on this issue

    Oct 30 07:58 am
  5. capri351351 View Profile

    We have about 23,000,000 people in Australia and about 7,000,000 tax payers, I recon, put them on a plane, no mucking about and send them home and stop waiting tax payers money.

    Oct 30 03:22 pm

Post your comment

To post a new comment, you must Sign in first.

Yahoo!7 News Preferences

Close

Select your state to see news for your area.