Have you noticed lately there's been a rather big shift in attitudes towards climate change?
Two years ago, there was a huge groundswell of support for the theory that global Warming equals climate change. It's been a time when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change almost unanimously agreed climate change is happening and humans are making a significant contribution.
But there have been a lot of opposing views from equally credible sources, so for a lot of us it's become very confusing. Who and what do we believe?
One thing is for sure, climate change is nothing new. It's been going on since time began and this is yet another spanner in the works.
A good example happened in our own backyard not that long ago. In 1991, Mt Pinatubo in the Philippines erupted and created a sulphuric acid haze that reached into the stratosphere.
Immediately, it spread further through the atmosphere and within two months, the ash was affecting most of the world.
It actually impacted Australia, with more vivid and dramatic sunsets and sunrises. That happens when light from the sun passes through the atmosphere and scatters off the added particles, creating brighter colours.
But the real impact was felt over a much larger area. It's thought for two years after the Mt Pinatubo eruption, the world's climate actually cooled, because the large ash clouds refected heat back into space.
So in theory, the climate changed, but unlike the current thinking, it was without any human intervention.
History has many similar tales to tell. In 1783, Benjamin Franklin noticed after a vocanic eruption in Iceland, sunlight directed through a magnifying glass no longer set fire to a piece of paper.
In 1815, after a huge eruption near Borneo, they went through a period known as "the year without summer", again because of the cooling affect of the volcanic ash.
So the debate goes on, but in many ways a lot of this is certainly nothing new.

Comments
I guess the fact that astronomers have been monitoring temperature increases on the surface of the other planets in the solar system lately creates a bit of a political problem to the "man made global warming crowd"...not many cars and industries in Mars....
Nov 9 01:26 pmHuman caused climate change is inaccurate propaganda. Garnaut's (an economist) report is based on the CSIRO & IPCC reports. Which have a disclaimer that their reports are based on models... no resposibility for the accuracy of forecasts or predictions iferred from this report or for any persons interpretations, deductions, conclusions or actions in reliance on this report. In other words, for the most part they're guessing. Yes the climate is changing its a natural cycle, to be conti
Nov 10 12:51 pmcontinued... trying to stop natural climate change is futile, money should be spent on ways to adapt to this change not wasted on trying to stop it. The imaginary world inside computer climate models are based on assumptions not fact they do not justly represent the real world. Equal debate needs to be heard there is too much alarmist propaganda and not enough realist (sceptics) information out there. People need both sides to have an educated opinion, not force fed the alarmist consensus.
Nov 10 01:00 pm"Cimate change"is just another means by world globalists to rip taxpayers off. Electro-magnetic polution is more of a threat to human beings than this swindle. However, where is money to be made on that issue? None!
Nov 11 10:44 amThe human race was race was once non existent on the face of this earth. We now have 6billion people wrecking our environment with their own conntries self serving agendas, and plans for greedy land grabbers, environment bashers, capitalist moguls, all wanting their own way. WHO IS GOING TO DRAW A LINE IN THE SAND AND DECIDE WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE WORLD, and lets do it together. We humans could kill the planet simply by overpopulation!!!!!!!
Nov 15 05:55 am