Have you noticed lately there's been a rather big shift in attitudes towards climate change?
Two years ago, there was a huge groundswell of support for the theory that global Warming equals climate change. It's been a time when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change almost unanimously agreed climate change is happening and humans are making a significant contribution.
But there have been a lot of opposing views from equally credible sources, so for a lot of us it's become very confusing. Who and what do we believe?
One thing is for sure, climate change is nothing new. It's been going on since time began and this is yet another spanner in the works.
A good example happened in our own backyard not that long ago. In 1991, Mt Pinatubo in the Philippines erupted and created a sulphuric acid haze that reached into the stratosphere.
Immediately, it spread further through the atmosphere and within two months, the ash was affecting most of the world.
It actually impacted Australia, with more vivid and dramatic sunsets and sunrises. That happens when light from the sun passes through the atmosphere and scatters off the added particles, creating brighter colours.
But the real impact was felt over a much larger area. It's thought for two years after the Mt Pinatubo eruption, the world's climate actually cooled, because the large ash clouds refected heat back into space.
So in theory, the climate changed, but unlike the current thinking, it was without any human intervention.
History has many similar tales to tell. In 1783, Benjamin Franklin noticed after a vocanic eruption in Iceland, sunlight directed through a magnifying glass no longer set fire to a piece of paper.
In 1815, after a huge eruption near Borneo, they went through a period known as "the year without summer", again because of the cooling affect of the volcanic ash.
So the debate goes on, but in many ways a lot of this is certainly nothing new.

Comments
John, well done to be willing to stick you neck out to question the politically correct point of view. travelingtigresse, you missed the point that a large number of scientist are not on the IPCC bandwagon. We even have Kevin Rudd being corrected by journalist pointing out that this is not the hotest time in recorded history. There is lots of evidence against AGW (the missing CO2 hotspot concentration for one) if you're willing to look.
Oct 2 09:15 pmthe facts areplain, there is no global warming catastrophe.The seas are not going to swamp us. There is no greenhouse gas warming, no devestating glacial melts. Antartica has 90% of the world's ice and it is getting colder and building deeper ice. Sun activity is decreasing so we may be on the verge of decreasing temperature. CO2 increasing is beneficial for plants and animal life up to 1000ppm.
Oct 4 02:41 amAll global warming people have is media swamping to proclaim their point of view.
The climate change theory was invented for the purpose of introducing a range of new taxes such as carbon tax and carbon trading. End of story.
Oct 4 05:42 pmI can remember when the climate change became a political issue used to scare the masses. I often wondered where it was used by the greens as a ways and means to get their projects off the ground. When it all started and a few times in between, noted scientists did go to the media to say what was being portrayed was not entirely truthful. They had proof that our contribution was minimal and in fact most of our climate changes were due to natural occurrences below ground. They were silenced.
Oct 6 12:54 pmHow much more evidence do we need. Earth is struggling to support its population. We are exhausting its resources and polluting it to death. We must protect our environment or suffer the consequences. It is not too early to start caring!!!!!!
Oct 6 03:00 pm