[change]

Max° Min°

Climate change: who do we believe?

By John Schluter | View Archive September 30th, 2008, 4:03 pm
Have you noticed lately there's been a rather big shift in attitudes towards climate change?

Two years ago, there was a huge groundswell of support for the theory that global Warming equals climate change. It's been a time when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change almost unanimously agreed climate change is happening and humans are making a significant contribution.

But there have been a lot of opposing views from equally credible sources, so for a lot of us it's become very confusing. Who and what do we believe?

One thing is for sure, climate change is nothing new. It's been going on since time began and this is yet another spanner in the works.

A good example happened in our own backyard not that long ago. In 1991, Mt Pinatubo in the Philippines erupted and created a sulphuric acid haze that reached into the stratosphere.

Immediately, it spread further through the atmosphere and within two months, the ash was affecting most of the world.

It actually impacted Australia, with more vivid and dramatic sunsets and sunrises. That happens when light from the sun passes through the atmosphere and scatters off the added particles, creating brighter colours.

But the real impact was felt over a much larger area. It's thought for two years after the Mt Pinatubo eruption, the world's climate actually cooled, because the large ash clouds refected heat back into space.

So in theory, the climate changed, but unlike the current thinking, it was without any human intervention.

History has many similar tales to tell. In 1783, Benjamin Franklin noticed after a vocanic eruption in Iceland, sunlight directed through a magnifying glass no longer set fire to a piece of paper.

In 1815, after a huge eruption near Borneo, they went through a period known as "the year without summer", again because of the cooling affect of the volcanic ash.

So the debate goes on, but in many ways a lot of this is certainly nothing new.

Comments

  1. keith.juliana View Profile

    Finnally, I have always said to ppl that climate change is not new. It is another way the governments can get more money, yes pollution is a bad thing, but remember everything we make comes from earth. Ozone hole, were has that gone? A way of releasing heat from earth is for the ozone to open up. It is now closed.

    Oct 17 02:34 pm
  2. skomina View Profile

    AGW was a hypothesis-(an idea) backed by numbers crunched in a oversimplistic model and 20 years of empirical data since 1990 show it a failed theory,Science Fiction-it was and still is-you just woke up i guess.bleet .bleet.bleet.feeling sheepish?

    Oct 20 07:28 pm
  3. gremarx View Profile

    All it takes is a serious financial crisis to get people questioning some of the left wing "holy cows" on climate change. It is certainly not the time for Australia to go it alone with half baked notions like "carbon trading" schemes etc. It's time for our current "holy trinity", "krudd", "wrong" &"garrotted" to take a reality check.

    Oct 21 09:33 am
  4. buttonbrite1 View Profile

    Human beings have flirted with apocalyptic theory since the beginning of recorded time. In my lifetime alone man on earth was ending due to: nuclear war (60's and 70's), AIDs epidemic (80's), the Hale-Bopp comet (90's) and now global warming. Can you blame me for being skeptical?

    Oct 21 01:38 pm
  5. gabriel_sassoon View Profile

    There is no scientific dispute over this.

    This article is a total fail.

    Oct 21 06:24 pm

Post your comment

To post a new comment, you must Sign in first.

Yahoo!7 News Preferences

Close

Select your state to see news for your area.