[change]

Max° Min°

Climate change: who do we believe?

By John Schluter | View Archive September 30th, 2008, 4:03 pm
Have you noticed lately there's been a rather big shift in attitudes towards climate change?

Two years ago, there was a huge groundswell of support for the theory that global Warming equals climate change. It's been a time when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change almost unanimously agreed climate change is happening and humans are making a significant contribution.

But there have been a lot of opposing views from equally credible sources, so for a lot of us it's become very confusing. Who and what do we believe?

One thing is for sure, climate change is nothing new. It's been going on since time began and this is yet another spanner in the works.

A good example happened in our own backyard not that long ago. In 1991, Mt Pinatubo in the Philippines erupted and created a sulphuric acid haze that reached into the stratosphere.

Immediately, it spread further through the atmosphere and within two months, the ash was affecting most of the world.

It actually impacted Australia, with more vivid and dramatic sunsets and sunrises. That happens when light from the sun passes through the atmosphere and scatters off the added particles, creating brighter colours.

But the real impact was felt over a much larger area. It's thought for two years after the Mt Pinatubo eruption, the world's climate actually cooled, because the large ash clouds refected heat back into space.

So in theory, the climate changed, but unlike the current thinking, it was without any human intervention.

History has many similar tales to tell. In 1783, Benjamin Franklin noticed after a vocanic eruption in Iceland, sunlight directed through a magnifying glass no longer set fire to a piece of paper.

In 1815, after a huge eruption near Borneo, they went through a period known as "the year without summer", again because of the cooling affect of the volcanic ash.

So the debate goes on, but in many ways a lot of this is certainly nothing new.

Comments

  1. thesoletrader View Profile

    I have to ask, is there anyone out there who agrees that this is just a natural occurance of nature? that like the surface of the earth and its micro climate, the outer stratosphere has a climatic seasonal pattern of its own, only for a more protracted period of time due to the larger scale of the solar system.

    Aug 3 01:08 pm
  2. bargwhany View Profile

    Man Made global warming, the biggest con ever invented. Wake up and start questioning this green sponsored rubbish...

    Aug 11 10:22 am
  3. wayne.fitzsimons View Profile

    I'm with you all the way here. There is no real evidence that this blip should indicate global warming caused by man. Indeed many scientists reckon we are actually heading into a cooling period and the current climate change will be shortlived. Others believe the global warming will trigger a cooling (due to the ocean conveyor currents slowing or stopping). For myself history shows ice and warming over millennia.

    Aug 13 06:02 am
  4. richie.costa View Profile

    How can anyone claim to know the truth about climate change, when no two scientists can agree on the subject?

    There is no concrete proof that climate change is real, and if it is real, whether it is actually a man made problem.

    One thing for certain, Australia's carbon emissions are almost zero, when compared to the rest of the world. In fact, the carbon emiisions from the entire southern hemisphere is negligible compared to Asia, Europe & the USA.

    Aug 13 08:21 pm
  5. sailfish1957 View Profile

    Thank God the Tide is starting to turn................... Please, no more looney greenies..........

    Aug 21 08:35 pm

Post your comment

To post a new comment, you must Sign in first.

Yahoo!7 News Preferences

Close

Select your state to see news for your area.