Have you noticed lately there's been a rather big shift in attitudes towards climate change?
Two years ago, there was a huge groundswell of support for the theory that global Warming equals climate change. It's been a time when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change almost unanimously agreed climate change is happening and humans are making a significant contribution.
But there have been a lot of opposing views from equally credible sources, so for a lot of us it's become very confusing. Who and what do we believe?
One thing is for sure, climate change is nothing new. It's been going on since time began and this is yet another spanner in the works.
A good example happened in our own backyard not that long ago. In 1991, Mt Pinatubo in the Philippines erupted and created a sulphuric acid haze that reached into the stratosphere.
Immediately, it spread further through the atmosphere and within two months, the ash was affecting most of the world.
It actually impacted Australia, with more vivid and dramatic sunsets and sunrises. That happens when light from the sun passes through the atmosphere and scatters off the added particles, creating brighter colours.
But the real impact was felt over a much larger area. It's thought for two years after the Mt Pinatubo eruption, the world's climate actually cooled, because the large ash clouds refected heat back into space.
So in theory, the climate changed, but unlike the current thinking, it was without any human intervention.
History has many similar tales to tell. In 1783, Benjamin Franklin noticed after a vocanic eruption in Iceland, sunlight directed through a magnifying glass no longer set fire to a piece of paper.
In 1815, after a huge eruption near Borneo, they went through a period known as "the year without summer", again because of the cooling affect of the volcanic ash.
So the debate goes on, but in many ways a lot of this is certainly nothing new.

Comments
ya enjoy ur life but please dont pass on your green house gases to other's kids or the genrations after.
Jun 14 04:17 pm"there have been a lot of opposing views from equally credible sources"
Jun 19 11:59 amLike what? Sources please? Did your kid write this for a school creative writing assignment? You should have told them to go with the story about the happy koala instead.
I guess that a lot of people use this as rationale to keep on chopping, polluting, hooning, not taking care of the planet and destroying. I don't mind a debate, but it used to absolve oneself from any responsibility.
Jun 23 05:15 pmYes,we know volcanic plumes affect the aptmoshere.We also know that co2 presents a runaway warming risk to the eco-system.Even if it were only a remote possibuility we would be fools not to address it.Do you really want to run the risk of ending life as we know it .And how would you explain it to your grandlkids?
Jul 17 11:05 amTheres plenty of credible evidence to suggest that the cycle of climate change is largely affected by non human sources, eg Methane from Cattle, Changes in the earths path around the sun and other contributors. While its true that humans do contribute towards global warming the reality seems to be that even if Australians did everything in their power to be responsible environmentally it would make not one jot of difference to to the earth's temperature, because we are less than 1% of emissi
Jul 23 12:04 pm