[change]

Max° Min°

Climate change: who do we believe?

By John Schluter | View Archive September 30th, 2008, 4:03 pm
Have you noticed lately there's been a rather big shift in attitudes towards climate change?

Two years ago, there was a huge groundswell of support for the theory that global Warming equals climate change. It's been a time when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change almost unanimously agreed climate change is happening and humans are making a significant contribution.

But there have been a lot of opposing views from equally credible sources, so for a lot of us it's become very confusing. Who and what do we believe?

One thing is for sure, climate change is nothing new. It's been going on since time began and this is yet another spanner in the works.

A good example happened in our own backyard not that long ago. In 1991, Mt Pinatubo in the Philippines erupted and created a sulphuric acid haze that reached into the stratosphere.

Immediately, it spread further through the atmosphere and within two months, the ash was affecting most of the world.

It actually impacted Australia, with more vivid and dramatic sunsets and sunrises. That happens when light from the sun passes through the atmosphere and scatters off the added particles, creating brighter colours.

But the real impact was felt over a much larger area. It's thought for two years after the Mt Pinatubo eruption, the world's climate actually cooled, because the large ash clouds refected heat back into space.

So in theory, the climate changed, but unlike the current thinking, it was without any human intervention.

History has many similar tales to tell. In 1783, Benjamin Franklin noticed after a vocanic eruption in Iceland, sunlight directed through a magnifying glass no longer set fire to a piece of paper.

In 1815, after a huge eruption near Borneo, they went through a period known as "the year without summer", again because of the cooling affect of the volcanic ash.

So the debate goes on, but in many ways a lot of this is certainly nothing new.

Comments

  1. kneebutt View Profile

    Global warming. 2 choices: listen to journalists or listen to scientists. Journos say it's real, scientists say it's crap. Not a difficult choice really. It's the new Y2K for suckers.

    May 29 05:17 pm
  2. fua57 View Profile

    carterrick72
    You are right mate,about Al Gore and the carbon company.well done good stuff.
    Al Gore is a Bilderburg Group member and so are many members of the US gov Robert Gates , Paul Voker , Henry KIssinger
    It should be no suprise to aussies that the same group is issueing orders with the running of this country.SAY NO to carbon tax.It is coming.

    May 31 06:36 pm
  3. inge_thompson2008 View Profile

    We all agree that our carbon levels have increased. No one agrees why. It might even be an important part of the earth cycle.

    Jun 3 03:30 am
  4. watuzi61 View Profile

    A HUGE - potentially - money making scam lead his highness Al Gore. There is SO MUCH action on behalf of the worlds LEADING scientists that there is seriously zero need for journos to research anything! All anyone NEEDS to do is just LISTEN to the real experts ie, REAL SCIENTISTS!!!! Its not rocket science, it's just mother nature doing her thing.
    Check it out kids.

    Jun 3 09:02 am
  5. watuzi61 View Profile

    An interesting aside - Al Gore lives in a mansion that has absolutely NO CONSIDERATION for our oh-so-fragile-environment! Isn't that a bit strange considering his "mission"?
    ...Then we have Mr G.W.B. living in his VERY high tech environmentally friendly Texas ranch!
    Even stranger.

    Jun 3 09:07 am

Post your comment

To post a new comment, you must Sign in first.

Yahoo!7 News Preferences

Close

Select your state to see news for your area.