Vote now for the biggest stories of the year

Company wins right to legally ban men from lesbian parties

Yahoo!7 July 23, 2009, 2:30 pm
If you are unable to view this video, you may need to install the latest Flash plug-in, available free here.

A party company specialising in dances for lesbians and bisexual women has won the legal right to ban men.

Pinkalicious was given the green light to stop men because they might pester women for sex.

Director Julie MacKenzie hailed the VCAT decision a landmark, saying it made Pinkalicious the only women-only party in Australia, the Herald Sun reports.

Ms MacKenzie complained to the tribunal she couldn't stop men attending the parties "even if I know they intend to hit on women".

Fellow organiser Samantha Stevens argued men should be banned because they would be intimidating and deter lesbian and bisexual patrons.

"In my experience feminine lesbians are often the target of heterosexual male fantasy, and therefore subject to more intrusive attention from them," Ms Stevens said.

"It is a major concern that heterosexual males will attend the Pinkalicious event in the hope they can achieve their desire for a sexual experience with multiple women."

VCAT ruled in favour of Pinkalicious this month, with Judge Marilyn Harbison noting no objections were raised after the proposed man ban was advertised.

But Men's Rights Agency director Sue Price slammed the ruling.

She said it contradicted Attorney-General Rob Hulls' move to open up elite men's venues, including the Melbourne and Athenaeum clubs, to women.

In May, Mr Hulls slammed private men's clubs as "a throwback to a bygone era" and said he wanted them to lose their exemption to anti-discrimination laws.

Ms Price said Pinkalicious was given special treatment.

"I get enormously angry about the laws," she said.

Ms MacKenzie was thrilled with the man ban.

"We are ecstatic about it," she said.

"The feedback I was getting from the girls was that they wanted something exclusive for women to be able to express themselves in a safe environment."

The Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission backed the ban.

"The Commission supports the type of events run by Pinkalicious because they offer a disadvantaged group the chance to experience supportive social occasions, feel safe in public spaces and build a sense of belonging," Commission CEO Dr Helen Szoke said.

VCAT has given gay men's pubs, including the Laird Hotel and the Peel Hotel, permission to ban women.

Show:
Newest First
Oldest First

31 - 40 of 57

First Page | < Previous | Next > | Last Page

57 Comments

  1. Mags 09:10am Friday 24th July 2009 EST Report Abuse

    Gay men have been given the right to ban hetrosexual women from their pubs and clubs, so why not let lesbians have the right to ban straight men? I know that at least half the men at my workplace think that all lesbians need is a good **** to turn them straight and they act on this. It gets really ...

  2. mel 09:06am Friday 24th July 2009 EST Report Abuse

    did anyone actually READ the story? "VCAT has given gay men's pubs, including the Laird Hotel and the Peel Hotel, permission to ban women." it's not just "special treatment for women" - it is a response to a request that was NOT OBJECTED TO.

  3. Gayle 09:01am Friday 24th July 2009 EST Report Abuse

    OMG...Who gives a damn....whats the problem of being excluded from somewhere...we are all excluded from different places throughout our lives....get over it

  4. Lane 08:42am Friday 24th July 2009 EST Report Abuse

    Alexander "give them an inch" - you're the reason they have to ban people... sigh. If people simply cared about people instead of caring what they do in the bedroom we'd all be a lot better off. Why do people obsess about homosexuals? Makes you think?

  5. Lane 08:38am Friday 24th July 2009 EST Report Abuse

    Makes perfect sense to me. We should have some freedom to exclude people - we exclude certain people from our homes. Gay men have banned women. It's not racism it's simply practical. This news is certainly earth-shattering.

  6. backo 07:16am Friday 24th July 2009 EST Report Abuse

    Why would a normal male want to attend anyhow?

  7. marchant888 06:56am Friday 24th July 2009 EST Report Abuse

    Heer we go. Whilst the rest of the nation bleeds from issues such as poverty, recession and illiteracy and crimee we spend our energiees towards mutants and perverts who some claim are normal. Women may ban men but not the other way around. Labour politics

  8. Jason A 04:03am Friday 24th July 2009 EST Report Abuse

    Exclusive men's clubs have always used the same sorts of excuses - that women change the feeling of the place, or the ability to freely express yourself, or whatever - to exclude women. And, rightly, that has been considered by our society to be sexist. But since when has sexism been okay so ...

  9. dd 12:42am Friday 24th July 2009 EST Report Abuse

    this is really upsetting to me.. as i am a lesbian trapped in a man's body...

  10. Chris 11:10pm Thursday 23rd July 2009 EST Report Abuse

    Hey people, You can not 'Discriminate in favour' of one group, whatever the racial, sexual or religous reasons without discriminating AGAINST someone else. This is an OXYMORON - Moron being what the pollies & power brokers consider our collective IQ to be when they inflic ...

31 - 40 of 57

First Page | < Previous | Next > | Last Page

Post your comment

Do you have a Yahoo! ID? Sign in | Sign up

Yahoo!7 News Preferences

Close

Select your state to see news for your area.